I have started an new thread, as the original thread
Selling a Proven Money Making System with ongoing training/mentoring seem to have drifted into discussion by those of us who are using it. I think our comments on the practicalities, good and bad, are better in a thread set up for this, and hope other members agree.
Current Exerience
Started
Pal's sytem at the end of March 2006. Four months in, I have 140 customers generating £1,300 a week, and have lent out £50K. Have done CCJ's on 3 borrowers (probably wasted money on the court fees, but look on it as a point of principle) and there will be 3 more this month. My lending terms are looser than Paul recommends in his manual, but for the most part has worked well though I do have more people behind in payments than I will accept long-term. Have a chap who trades on ebay, now borrows £2K a time and pays this back by internet banking over 6 to 8 weeks as he sells the stuff he buys in bulk. Another 6 customers also pay direct into our account (but by phone or internet bank, not by Standing Order - which I don't think work in our business).
Bad PointsThe Competition Commission's enqury into Home Credit (still ongoing) have issued some interim conclusions. In the
Provisional Findings Report, Item 13 has:
We found that although there are few barriers to small scale entry to home credit, there are significant barriers to large scale entry or to expansion. These included the risk of adverse selection (new customers represent a worse default risk than existing ones), the advantages enjoyed by incumbent lenders, and the need to build local density to operate efficiently.Adverse Selection means that any new entrant is more likely to pick up clients who either can no longer lend from existing players, or who might be on restricted credit terms. This is why new entrants should, for safety and minimal bad debts, follow Paul's limits and procedures. Sometimes though, you just can't help but pick up a number of problem clients
Picked up a lass, who paid regularly for 4 weeks (though currently 3 weeks behind). She introduced her mum, and her mum then introduced 3 others on the (quite respectable) estate, who then introduced 6 others all within a week or so (total of 10). Just discovered mum and (probably) all those referred on from her have a crack habit, though quite well controlled - and this probably explains why payments are behind, with repeated visits needed to get any sort of money. Unlike some deliberate avoiders, I think I'll get my money back - but doubt if I'll have made anything on them, taking into account the number of repeat visits needed.
Tip: Go through your clients and
rate them A, B, C, or D. A's and B's are what you want your client base
to consist of long-term. C's are those you have and persevere with at
the moment, but will dispose of when your portfolio matures to the size
you want. D's are the customers for whom you made a bad lending
decision, and to whom you won't lend againThe only other significant bad decision I've made that I can think of is to do a top-up to an enquirer from my post office advert after only two repayments (went from £200 to £350) after him pleading that he had managed to arrange with his ex to have his daughter for the whole of the last half term break, and he wanted to take her on holiday for a couple of days. Genuine and specific reason thought I, so said yes. Zilch paid since and he's now 8 weeks behind, now had a Default Notice, and will do a CCJ on him this month via
Money Claim OnlineGood PointsAt least 40% of my loan book is to customers who really appreciate the savings that can be made through Pauls system. Not all of them are the best of payers, and some do skip payments meaning that they might not get much discount in the end - but their heart is in the right place. These are my A and B customers, and I want all my loan book to be to these in the future, and the more A's the better. As a result, I have been thinking about how to reward these good customers. I got my inspiration from a customer I took on a month ago.
He has used just one of the bigger companies off and on for the last 12 years. He last had a loan with them 6 months ago and told me that he said to the agent that he always gets a £300 loan, and the rate is always the same, even though he normally never misses a payment, and usually settles early. She said more-or-less that it is one size fits all, and he gets the same rate as a new customer.
What I have done is to decide on a form of Customer Status: Standard, Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum. I have now written a "good news" letter to 3 customers telling them that with immediate effect they have been elevated to Bronze status, and to one excellent customer Silver status. This gives them, for each week they are not in arrears (these have never been in arrears though) for Bronze I will allow them a 5% discount in interest charged; for Silver 10%. I tell them that on a standard £200 loan this will save them approx £9 and £18 respectively, and enable them to finish the loan 1 or two weeks earlier, as appropriate. This protects me, as the legal agreement they sign is the same as everyone else (I have the CCA pre-print mine, saves masses of time plus I don't forget to put in some of the required information) and if they do go into arrears, then interest will continue to accrue up to the maximum in the agreement. It also gives the "reward" that my new customer didn't get from his former lender.
ConclusionBest business I have ever gotten into, even taking the bad points into account. Met some lovely people (was doing a top-up for a regular recently, and while sitting on the couch doing the paperwork their young son came up and gave me a hug. I thought that was lovely) who really appreciate a genuine company that is not just trying to get the most money out of them.
Look forward to discussing it more with you.