Paul !
Sorry - I've only just noticed this thread.
Green Belt is a total hiding to nothing for housebuilding unless the dwelling is for the essential needs of agriculture, forestry, or some other business demanding a rural location and justifying a 24/7 on-site presence.
Hopefully you have since read The Land Profits System and reached the right conclusions yourself before consulting the local planners. (I don't ever consult them, incidentally. Central Government recommends it in the form of pre-application discussion, but 20 years experience has confirmed that you cannot rely on a damn thing they say ! Even if you get their "advice" in writing, there will be a paragraph near the end of the letter indicating that this is officer level advice and the members may take a different decision - meaning that their advice is worth nothing!)
There has been much talk by government Ministers and ex-Ministers (Prescott in particular) about allowing building on Green Belt and reducing land so designated. (So-called "landbanking" companies flogging "plots" hype up that talk as if it is all about to happen.)
In fact there is currently FAR more Green Belt than when Labour took office in 1997 and that is unlikely to change. The only time land can normally be taken out of Green Belt is where the planning authority is otherwise unable to supply sufficient land for housing needs.
So .... my advice is, if you want it for housing, don't touch it with a bargepole. And the price is ludicrous.
LAND PLANNING ASSOCIATES
Planning Law Consultants & Planning Appeals Specialists
www.landplanning.org.uk
email: info@landplanning.org.uk