Hi Rialto
I understand point you make about some vendors having an unrealistic optimism about their MV.
I would ask in response.....
Is it better to have X qty of leads which have said YES to 'upto 80%' of MV and look at these as having a strong INTENT to negotiate further?
or
Is it better to change the question to 'upto 75%' of MV, and potentially lose half your leads, together with the opportunity to NEGOTIATE with those who would have said YES to 'upto 80%' of MV.
You can't do business with the vendors who don't fill out your application form.
Furthermore, if competitors (both online and in the newspapers and leaflets) are seen to be offering upto 80% or more, you run the risk of losing even more potential applicants if we are seen to be offering (at face value) substancially less than others.
Plus - there is also the likelyhood that leads would cost more if there was less yeild, therefore the cost per 'deal' to the investor, could potentially be higher - or at least no cheaper by increasing the discount.
You and I have both been involved in direct sales for a long time and understand that there is a fine balance here between QUALIFICATION and NEGOTIATION.
There is no substitute for research and negotiation, and as you say, learning which deals to do, and which deals to walk away from - just increasing the discount on the application form is not a solution to a lack of either of these skills.
This would probably account for the increase in demand for ready made deals, from those investors who dont have time, experience or inclination to do the research and negotiation for themselves.
Having said that - Im always willing to listen to another point of view (especially my own customers), and make changes where appropriate.
Despite what Clottie may think - I really do look for win-win relationships with my investors
Robert